The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of testicular cancers

Gary J. Cook*, Aslam Sohaib, Robert A. Huddart, David P. Dearnaley, Alan Horwich, Sue Chua

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the utility of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in managing testicular cancer. 

Patients and methods: Sixty-two patients (29 seminoma, 28 nonseminoma and five mixed) underwent 75 18F-FDG PET/CT scans (16 scans for primary staging, 44 for residual masses and 15 for rising tumour markers). Follow-up histology, clinical scans and tumour marker results were included for retrospective analysis.

Results (i) Primary staging: eight of 11 patients with equivocal CT scans had true-negative 18F-FDG PET/CT scans. Five high-risk patients with normal stage 1 CT scans had negative18F-FDG PET/CT scans, but two subsequently relapsed. (ii) Residual masses: of the 20 scans interpreted as showing viable disease, five were false positive. Nineteen scans were negative (18 true negative and one false negative). (iii) Rising tumour markers: of the 15 scans, two were false negative and 13 were true positive. 

Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/CT is helpful when primary staging CT scans are equivocal but insufficiently sensitive to predict relapse in high-risk patients with normal CT scans. With residual masses, a negative scan is rarely associated with relapse. 18F-FDG PET/CT is helpful in defining recurrent disease in the majority of patients with rising tumour markers and negative CT scans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)702-708
Number of pages7
JournalNuclear Medicine Communications
Volume36
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2015

Keywords

  • <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT
  • residual mass
  • staging
  • testicular cancer
  • tumour markers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of testicular cancers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this