The Social Dynamics of Collective Action: Evidence from the Diffusion of the Swing Riots, 1830-31: Evidence from the diffusion of the swing riots, 1830–1831

Gabriel Leon-Ablan*, Toke Aidt, Max Satchell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
129 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Social unrest often begins suddenly and spreads quickly. What is the information
that drives its diffusion? How is this information transmitted? And who responds
to this information? We present a general framework that emphasizes three aspects of the diffusion process: the networks through which information travels, whether information about repression affects participation, and the role of organizers. We use this framework to derive empirical hypotheses that we test in the context of the English Swing riots of 1830-31. This was the foundational case in the study of unrest in social history, and our identification strategy relies on spatiotemporal variation particular to this historical period. We find that diffusion was significant and that information about the riots traveled through personal and trade networks, but not through transport or mass media networks. This information was not about repression; and local organizers played an important role in the diffusion of the riots.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJOURNAL OF POLITICS
Early online date15 Oct 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Oct 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Social Dynamics of Collective Action: Evidence from the Diffusion of the Swing Riots, 1830-31: Evidence from the diffusion of the swing riots, 1830–1831'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this