King's College London

Research portal

The Statistical Order of Discourse: How Information Theory Encoded Industrial and Political Discipline

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationArticulating Media
Subtitle of host publicationGenealogy, Interface, Situation
EditorsZetter Nathaniel, James Gabrillo
PublisherOpen Humanities Press
Number of pages76
Accepted/In press1 Aug 2020
Published1 Mar 2023


  • 2023 Geoghegan Statistical Order Discourse

    2023_Geoghegan_Statistical_Order_Discourse.pdf, 3.39 MB, application/pdf

    Uploaded date:09 Mar 2023

    This is an open access book, licensed under the Creative Commons By Attribution
    Non-Commercial Share Alike license. Under this license, authors allow anyone to
    download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy this book so long as the
    authors and source are cited, the use is not commercial, and resulting derivative
    works are licensed under the same or similar license. Read more about the license
    Cover Art, figures, and other media included with this book may be under different
    copyright restrictions.

King's Authors


The mid-century proliferation of communication theories across the
sciences, including Wiener’s cybernetics, represented the far-reaching
generalisation of a new logic of the trace made possible by industrial
communications. Yet the uniformity of that trace – the apparently universal
and standard operations it disclosed within communications – also
encouraged specific forms of power. Communication theories accommodated
political, economic, and cultural communications to the discipline of a single
‘signal economy’. Its search for an integrated and monopolistic management
of communications served empires and nation-states positioned to command
vast technoscientific infrastructures. It likewise consolidated a broader set of
epistemological transformations that rested on the widespread circulation of
statistics, printed numbers, and territorial ambitions of imperial, national,
and colonial powers. These powers embraced a technoscientific strategy
that downplayed the significance of origin, intention, and meaning in
communications in favour of a new conception of the traces of the world
in terms of immanent relations among discrete, serial, and standardised
elements. Pushed to its logical extreme, it encouraged an uncanny conception
of humans as the channels – rather than the authors – of data streams that
subtended machines, nature, economics, and language. As human intentions
waned, information theory positioned a new authority that rose to the
fore, residing in the technoscientific authority of national and industrial

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454