King's College London

Research portal

The Tolerant Animal Advocate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalThe Harvard Review of Philosophy
VolumeXXVIII
DOIs
E-pub ahead of print9 Oct 2021

Documents

  • Tolerant Animal Advocate

    post_proof_Tolerant_Animal_Advocate.pdf, 257 KB, application/pdf

    Uploaded date:27 Oct 2021

    Version:Accepted author manuscript

    Archived in accordance with the journal's Green OA policy.

King's Authors

Abstract

One of the recurring problems of animal rights advocacy in re- cent years has been the difficulty of matching up such advocacy with the broadly liberal political environment in which it operates. Animal advocates may score high on compassion for the animal victims of injustice, but much lower when it comes to political compassion for opponents. Fairly or other- wise, those with a robust, partisan commitment to animal rights have secured a reputation for intolerance. So much so, that it may even be difficult to form a plausible picture of what tolerant animal advocacy would look like, without compromising the partisanship of advocates. This paper attempts to unify partisanship and tolerance within a picture of the tolerant animal advocate as someone whose agency is marked by at least two significant constraining features. Firstly, they will engage in negative appraisals of dietary practices, but will not ordinarily move from such appraisals to any overall judgment of the character of others. Hence, they will be in no position to hold that vegetarians or vegans are in some sense better people than meat eaters. Secondly, they will deploy charges of hypocrisy rarely and with caution.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454