The unbearable lightness of being? Reconfiguring the moral underpinnings and sources of ontological security

Derek Bolton

doi:10.1017/S1752971922000173

The unbearable lightness of being? Reconfiguring the moral underpinnings and sources of ontological security

Derek Bolton^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Defence Studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While ontological security (OS) studies have gone through a recent evolution, shifting toward psychoanalytic and existential accounts of anxiety, this article argues there remains a deficient engagement with the affective environments within which actors operate. Specifically, focusing on shared emotions/affect allows for a thicker account of the mechanisms of OS-including the constitutive forces underpinning society/societal trust, the role/power of signifiers and narratives, and the basis upon which actors promote social change. Accordingly, it suggests Durkheim's social theory, his broader concept of 'religion' as an affective community constituted by faith in a moral order entwined with the sacred, offers a viable pathway to develop these insights and develop a new basis for the mechanisms of OS. The drive for OS thus becomes reconfigured as an effort to act faithfully toward a dynamic moral order, while ontological insecurity emerges from the unbearable lightness of being experienced within moral disorder. Following Durkheim's preliminary argument on nationalism representing the continuation of religion, we can then revise how/why nations are integral to OS and International Relations. Specifically, we can view foreign policy as informed by debates around how to act faithfully toward the moral order-a process interrelated with revitalization and renewal of the sacred.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	234-262
Number of pages	29
Journal	International Theory
Volume	15
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971922000173
Publication status	Published - 12 Jul 2023

Keywords

Durkheim
foreign policy
International Relations theory
moral order
nationalism
ontological security

Access to Document

10.1017/S1752971922000173

Cite this

@article{48b5d373444f4945a73afdb6c6fdf839,

title = "The unbearable lightness of being? Reconfiguring the moral underpinnings and sources of ontological security",

abstract = "While ontological security (OS) studies have gone through a recent evolution, shifting toward psychoanalytic and existential accounts of anxiety, this article argues there remains a deficient engagement with the affective environments within which actors operate. Specifically, focusing on shared emotions/affect allows for a thicker account of the mechanisms of OS-including the constitutive forces underpinning society/societal trust, the role/power of signifiers and narratives, and the basis upon which actors promote social change. Accordingly, it suggests Durkheim's social theory, his broader concept of 'religion' as an affective community constituted by faith in a moral order entwined with the sacred, offers a viable pathway to develop these insights and develop a new basis for the mechanisms of OS. The drive for OS thus becomes reconfigured as an effort to act faithfully toward a dynamic moral order, while ontological insecurity emerges from the unbearable lightness of being experienced within moral disorder. Following Durkheim's preliminary argument on nationalism representing the continuation of religion, we can then revise how/why nations are integral to OS and International Relations. Specifically, we can view foreign policy as informed by debates around how to act faithfully toward the moral order-a process interrelated with revitalization and renewal of the sacred.",

keywords = "Durkheim, foreign policy, International Relations theory, moral order, nationalism, ontological security",

author = "Derek Bolton",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press.",

year = "2023",

month = jul,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1017/S1752971922000173",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

pages = "234--262",

journal = "International Theory",

issn = "1752-9719",

publisher = "Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The unbearable lightness of being? Reconfiguring the moral underpinnings and sources of ontological security

AU - Bolton, Derek

PY - 2023/7/12

Y1 - 2023/7/12

N2 - While ontological security (OS) studies have gone through a recent evolution, shifting toward psychoanalytic and existential accounts of anxiety, this article argues there remains a deficient engagement with the affective environments within which actors operate. Specifically, focusing on shared emotions/affect allows for a thicker account of the mechanisms of OS-including the constitutive forces underpinning society/societal trust, the role/power of signifiers and narratives, and the basis upon which actors promote social change. Accordingly, it suggests Durkheim's social theory, his broader concept of 'religion' as an affective community constituted by faith in a moral order entwined with the sacred, offers a viable pathway to develop these insights and develop a new basis for the mechanisms of OS. The drive for OS thus becomes reconfigured as an effort to act faithfully toward a dynamic moral order, while ontological insecurity emerges from the unbearable lightness of being experienced within moral disorder. Following Durkheim's preliminary argument on nationalism representing the continuation of religion, we can then revise how/why nations are integral to OS and International Relations. Specifically, we can view foreign policy as informed by debates around how to act faithfully toward the moral order-a process interrelated with revitalization and renewal of the sacred.

AB - While ontological security (OS) studies have gone through a recent evolution, shifting toward psychoanalytic and existential accounts of anxiety, this article argues there remains a deficient engagement with the affective environments within which actors operate. Specifically, focusing on shared emotions/affect allows for a thicker account of the mechanisms of OS-including the constitutive forces underpinning society/societal trust, the role/power of signifiers and narratives, and the basis upon which actors promote social change. Accordingly, it suggests Durkheim's social theory, his broader concept of 'religion' as an affective community constituted by faith in a moral order entwined with the sacred, offers a viable pathway to develop these insights and develop a new basis for the mechanisms of OS. The drive for OS thus becomes reconfigured as an effort to act faithfully toward a dynamic moral order, while ontological insecurity emerges from the unbearable lightness of being experienced within moral disorder. Following Durkheim's preliminary argument on nationalism representing the continuation of religion, we can then revise how/why nations are integral to OS and International Relations. Specifically, we can view foreign policy as informed by debates around how to act faithfully toward the moral order-a process interrelated with revitalization and renewal of the sacred.

KW - Durkheim

KW - foreign policy

KW - International Relations theory

KW - moral order

KW - nationalism

KW - ontological security

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164376122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1752971922000173

DO - 10.1017/S1752971922000173

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85164376122

SN - 1752-9719

VL - 15

SP - 234

EP - 262

JO - International Theory

JF - International Theory

IS - 2

ER -

The unbearable lightness of being? Reconfiguring the moral underpinnings and sources of ontological security

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this