The waning legitimacy of international organisations and their promissory visions

Maren Elfert, Euan Auld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We argue that the legitimacy of international organisations (IOs) as self-proclaimed representatives of humankind, which was unfounded from the outset, is waning. To substantiate that claim, we undertake a critical inquiry into the legitimacy of the promissory visions pursued by IOs in the field of education across three historical periods. The first traces the rationalistic educational planning and idealistic ‘one world’ projects of the post-World War II period. The second examines the era of globalisation, when the discourse that legitimised the educational visions of IOs shifted towards the promises of the ‘global knowledge economy’. The third discusses the contemporary trend towards emergency governance and crisis narratives. While the narratives of progress shifted, a pattern that has emerged is the move towards globalism and uniformity. Drawing on insights from philosophy and historical studies of world-empire, we argue that the world-making experiments conducted by IOs were destined to be unsuccessful.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-400
Number of pages24
JournalCOMPARATIVE EDUCATION
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • International organisations; global governance; promissory visions; legitimacy; Empire

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The waning legitimacy of international organisations and their promissory visions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this