Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review

Georgia De Rossi, Anna Georgiades*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: Thinking biases have been proposed to be involved in the genesis and maintenance of delusions. Persecutory delusions are considered one of the most commonly occurring delusional subtypes and have a considerable impact on the life of the sufferers. Their clinical relevance confers a rationale for investigating them. Particularly, this review aims at elucidating which biases are involved in their development and persistence.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Health were searched from the year 2000 to June 2020. A formal narrative synthesis was employed to report the findings and a quality assessment of included studies was conducted.
Results: 25 studies were included. Overall, 18 thinking biases were identified. Hostility and trustworthiness judgement biases appeared to be specific to persecutory delusions while jumping to conclusions, self-serving attributional biases and belief inflexibility were proposed to be more closely related to other delusional subtypes. While the majority of the biases identified were suggested to be involved in delusion maintenance, hostility biases, need for closure and personalising attributional biases were believed to also have aetiological influences.
Conclusions: The findings showed that some cognitive biases are specific to paranoid psychosis and appear to be involved in the formation and/or persistence of persecutory delusions.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEarly Intervention in Psychiatry
Publication statusPublished - 13 Mar 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thinking biases and their role in persecutory delusions: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this