Too similar, too different? The paradoxical dualism of psychiatric stigma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
130 Downloads (Pure)


Challenges to psychiatric stigma fall between a rock and a hard place. Decreasing one prejudice may inadvertently increase another. Emphasising similarities between mental illness and ‘ordinary’ experience to escape the fear-related prejudices associated with the imagined ‘otherness' of persons with mental illness risks conclusions that mental illness indicates moral weakness and the loss of any benefits of a medical model. An emphasis on illness and difference from normal experience risks a response of fear of the alien. Thus, a ‘likeness-based’ and ‘unlikeness-based’ conception of psychiatric stigma can lead to prejudices stemming from paradoxically opposing assumptions about mental illness. This may create a troubling impasse for anti-stigma campaigns.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)148-151
JournalThe Psychiatric Bulletin (United Kingdom)
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014


Dive into the research topics of 'Too similar, too different? The paradoxical dualism of psychiatric stigma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this