Traumatic axonal injury influences the cognitive effect of non-invasive brain stimulation

Lucia M. Li, Ines R. Violante, Karl Zimmerman, Rob Leech, Adam Hampshire, Maneesh Patel, Alexander Opitz, David McArthur, Amy Jolly, David W. Carmichael, David J. Sharp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation has been widely investigated as a potential treatment for a range of neurological and psychiatric conditions, including brain injury. However, the behavioural effects of brain stimulation are variable, for reasons that are poorly understood. This is a particular challenge for traumatic brain injury, where patterns of damage and their clinical effects are heterogeneous. Here we test the hypothesis that the response to transcranial direct current stimulation following traumatic brain injury is dependent on white matter damage within the stimulated network. We used a novel simultaneous stimulation-MRI protocol applying anodal, cathodal and sham stimulation to 24 healthy control subjects and 35 patients with moderate/severe traumatic brain injury. Stimulation was applied to the right inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula node of the salience network, which was targeted because our previous work had shown its importance to executive function. Stimulation was applied during performance of the Stop Signal Task, which assesses response inhibition, a key component of executive function. Structural MRI was used to assess the extent of brain injury, including diffusion MRI assessment of post-traumatic axonal injury. Functional MRI, which was simultaneously acquired to delivery of stimulation, assessed the effects of stimulation on cognitive network function. Anodal stimulation improved response inhibition in control participants, an effect that was not observed in the patient group. The extent of traumatic axonal injury within the salience network strongly influenced the behavioural response to stimulation. Increasing damage to the tract connecting the stimulated right inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula to the rest of the salience network was associated with reduced beneficial effects of stimulation. In addition, anodal stimulation normalized default mode network activation in patients with poor response inhibition, suggesting that stimulation modulates communication between the networks involved in supporting cognitive control. These results demonstrate an important principle: that white matter structure of the connections within a stimulated brain network influences the behavioural response to stimulation. This suggests that a personalized approach to non-invasive brain stimulation is likely to be necessary, with structural integrity of the targeted brain networks an important criterion for patient selection and an individualized approach to the selection of stimulation parameters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3280-3293
Number of pages14
JournalBrain : a journal of neurology
Volume142
Issue number10
Early online date30 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Keywords

  • axonal injury
  • brain stimulation
  • response inhibition
  • salience network
  • traumatic brain injury

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Traumatic axonal injury influences the cognitive effect of non-invasive brain stimulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this