King's College London

Research portal

UK neonatal resuscitation survey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article numberPMID: 30355782 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315526
Pages (from-to)F1-F2
Number of pages2
JournalArchives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Early online date24 Oct 2018
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Oct 2018

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

Background: Previous surveys have demonstrated that neonatal resuscitation practices on the delivery suite vary between UK units, particularly according to the hospital’s neonatal unit’s level. Our aim was to determine if recent changes to the Resuscitation Council guidelines had influenced clinical practice Methods: Surveys of resuscitation practices at UK delivery units carried out in 2012 and 2017 were compared. Results: Comparing 2017 to 2012, initial resuscitation using air was more commonly used in both term (98% versus 75%, p<0.001) and preterm (84% versus 34%, <0.001) born infants. Exhaled carbon dioxide monitoring was more frequently employed in 2017 (84% versus 19%p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in practices according to the level of neonatal care provided by the hospital. Conclusion: There have been significant changes in neonatal resuscitation practices in the delivery suite since 2012 regardless of the different levels of neonatal care offered.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454