Unity in Diversity? Reflections on Development Studies in the Mid-2020s

Andy Sumner

doi:10.1057/s41287-024-00636-x

Unity in Diversity? Reflections on Development Studies in the Mid-2020s

Andy Sumner^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Development Studies (DS) demonstrates maturity as a field of inquiry marked by the half-century anniversaries of journals, institutes, and scholarly associations of DS. There is vitality in terms of the volume of research and the buoyant numbers of students engaging with the subject, though DS continues to fragment. The central argument of this paper is that contemporary DS has four broad ‘schools of thought’ which differ significantly in terms of positions taken on the framing of, and universality of development. A typology of DS is proposed which illustrates this. The paper posits that DS would be healthier intellectually if the divides were the subject of greater dialogue. Potential avenues for initiating this discussion are suggested.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1280-1298
Number of pages	19
Journal	European Journal of Development Research
Volume	36
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-024-00636-x
Publication status	Published - Oct 2024

Keywords

Cross-disciplinarity
Development studies
Epistemology
Knowledge
Ontology

Access to Document

10.1057/s41287-024-00636-x

Cite this

@article{d2ceb1dfa079472e8dab39ac6ed2fa1d,

title = "Unity in Diversity? Reflections on Development Studies in the Mid-2020s",

abstract = "Development Studies (DS) demonstrates maturity as a field of inquiry marked by the half-century anniversaries of journals, institutes, and scholarly associations of DS. There is vitality in terms of the volume of research and the buoyant numbers of students engaging with the subject, though DS continues to fragment. The central argument of this paper is that contemporary DS has four broad {\textquoteleft}schools of thought{\textquoteright} which differ significantly in terms of positions taken on the framing of, and universality of development. A typology of DS is proposed which illustrates this. The paper posits that DS would be healthier intellectually if the divides were the subject of greater dialogue. Potential avenues for initiating this discussion are suggested.",

keywords = "Cross-disciplinarity, Development studies, Epistemology, Knowledge, Ontology",

author = "Andy Sumner",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",

year = "2024",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1057/s41287-024-00636-x",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

pages = "1280--1298",

journal = "European Journal of Development Research",

issn = "0957-8811",

publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unity in Diversity? Reflections on Development Studies in the Mid-2020s

AU - Sumner, Andy

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.

PY - 2024/10

Y1 - 2024/10

N2 - Development Studies (DS) demonstrates maturity as a field of inquiry marked by the half-century anniversaries of journals, institutes, and scholarly associations of DS. There is vitality in terms of the volume of research and the buoyant numbers of students engaging with the subject, though DS continues to fragment. The central argument of this paper is that contemporary DS has four broad ‘schools of thought’ which differ significantly in terms of positions taken on the framing of, and universality of development. A typology of DS is proposed which illustrates this. The paper posits that DS would be healthier intellectually if the divides were the subject of greater dialogue. Potential avenues for initiating this discussion are suggested.

AB - Development Studies (DS) demonstrates maturity as a field of inquiry marked by the half-century anniversaries of journals, institutes, and scholarly associations of DS. There is vitality in terms of the volume of research and the buoyant numbers of students engaging with the subject, though DS continues to fragment. The central argument of this paper is that contemporary DS has four broad ‘schools of thought’ which differ significantly in terms of positions taken on the framing of, and universality of development. A typology of DS is proposed which illustrates this. The paper posits that DS would be healthier intellectually if the divides were the subject of greater dialogue. Potential avenues for initiating this discussion are suggested.

KW - Cross-disciplinarity

KW - Development studies

KW - Epistemology

KW - Knowledge

KW - Ontology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194851029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/s41287-024-00636-x

DO - 10.1057/s41287-024-00636-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85194851029

SN - 0957-8811

VL - 36

SP - 1280

EP - 1298

JO - European Journal of Development Research

JF - European Journal of Development Research

IS - 5

ER -

Unity in Diversity? Reflections on Development Studies in the Mid-2020s

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this