King's College London

Research portal

Use of balloon expandable transcatheter valves for valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerative stentless aortic bioprostheses: Technical considerations and results

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Vinayak Bapat, William Davies, Rizwan Attia, Jane Hancock, Kirsty Bolter, Christopher Young, Simon Redwood, Martyn Thomas

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)917-924
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume148
Issue number3
DOIs
PublishedSep 2014

King's Authors

Abstract

Objective: Transcatheter valve-in-valve is an accepted treatment in high-risk patients with degenerative stented bioprostheses in the aortic position. Experience in treating stentless valves is, however, limited. Our aim was to determine the feasibility and single-center outcome of balloon expandable SAPIEN valve placement in degenerated stentless aortic valve bioprostheses.

Methods: From February 2010 to January 2014, 10 patients with failing stentless bioprostheses underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve (SAPIEN, SAPIEN XT, and SAPIEN 3) at our institution. Seven patients had valve failure due to regurgitation and three to stenosis. The mean age was 73.3 +/- 15.0 years. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 31.8 +/- 20.3, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 7.6 +/- 5.4.

Results: Technical success was achieved in 9 of 10 patients. One patient required immediate placement of a second valve owing to low placement of the first. Two intraoperative complications developed that needed additional procedures. One patient underwent immediate repair of a right ventricular perforation from a pacing lead, the other, reexploration for epicardial bleeding. No deaths occurred. The median length of stay was 8.5 days (range, 3-44). The mean follow-up was 8.1 months (range, 1-21). No late reoperations or reinterventions were required.

Conclusions: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation after previous stentless aortic valve replacement is technically demanding but a safe and feasible approach. The early results were excellent, with consistent improvement in hemodynamics. Prospective long-term follow-up in larger series is needed to evaluate this technique further.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454