King's College London

Research portal

Utilising the Delphi Process to Develop a Proficiency-based Progression Train-the-trainer Course for Robotic Surgery Training

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Justin W Collins, Jeffrey Levy, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Anthony Gallagher, Mark Coleman, Tom Cecil, Anders Ericsson, Alexandre Mottrie, Peter Wiklund, Kamran Ahmed, Johann Pratschke, Gianluca Casali, Ahmed Ghazi, Marcos Gomez, Andrew Hung, Anne Arnold, Joel Dunning, Martin Martino, Carlos Vaz, Eric Friedman & 8 more Jean-Marc Baste, Roberto Bergamaschi, Richard Feins, David Earle, Martin Pusic, Owen Montgomery, Carla Pugh, Richard M Satava

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)775-785
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume75
Issue number5
Early online date19 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

King's Authors

Abstract

CONTEXT: As the role of robot-assisted surgery continues to expand, development of standardised and validated training programmes is becoming increasingly important.

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance on an optimised "train-the-trainer" (TTT) structured educational programme for surgical trainers, in which delegates learn a standardised approach to training candidates in skill acquisition. We aim to describe a TTT course for robotic surgery based on the current published literature and to define the key elements within a TTT course by seeking consensus from an expert committee formed of key opinion leaders in training.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The project was carried out in phases: a systematic review of the current evidence was conducted, a face-to-face meeting was held in Philadelphia, and then an initial survey was created based on the current literature and expert opinion and sent to the committee. Thirty-two experts in training, including clinicians, academics, and industry, contributed to the Delphi process. The Delphi process underwent three rounds of survey in total. Additions to the second- and third-round surveys were formulated based on the answers and comments from the previous rounds. Consensus opinion was defined as ≥80% agreement.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: There was 100% consensus that there was a need for a standardized TTT course in robotic surgery. A consensus was reached in multiple areas, including the following: (1) definitions and terminologies, (2) qualifications to attend, (3) course objectives, (4) precourse considerations, (5) requirement of e-learning, (6) theory and course content, and (7) measurement of outcomes and performance level verification. The resulting formulated curriculum showed good internal consistency among experts, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.90.

CONCLUSIONS: Using the Delphi methodology, we achieved an international consensus among experts to develop and reach content validation for a standardised TTT curriculum for robotic surgery training. This defined content lays the foundation for developing a proficiency-based progression model for trainers in robotic surgery. This TTT curriculum will require further validation.

PATIENT SUMMARY: As the role of robot-assisted surgery continues to expand, development of standardised and validated training programmes is becoming increasingly important. There is currently a lack of high-level evidence on how best to train trainers in robot-assisted surgery. We report a consensus view on a standardised "train-the trainer" curriculum focused on robotic surgery. It was formulated by training experts from the USA and Europe, combining current evidence for training with experts' knowledge of surgical training.

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454