King's College London

Research portal

Validation of the BPro radial pulse waveform acquisition device in pregnancy and gestational hypertensive disorders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Adam Jakes, Julie Wade, Zoe Vowles, Paul T Seed, Andrew H Shennan, Lucy C Chappell, Diane Nzelu

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-384
Number of pages5
JournalBLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING
DOIs
E-pub ahead of print14 Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

King's Authors

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate the BPro blood pressure (BP) wrist device for use in pregnancy and preeclampsia according to the Universal Standard protocol.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: BP was measured sequentially in 45 pregnant women (including 15 with preeclampsia, 15 with gestational hypertension and 15 who remained normotensive) alternating between a mercury sphygmomanometer and BPro device.

RESULTS: The BPro is accurate in pregnancy with a mean device-observer difference of -1.7 ± 6.1 and 0.1 ± 4.6 mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively. In women with preeclampsia, BPro also met the validation criteria for the Universal Standard protocol with a mean device-observer difference of -2.7 ± 7.1 and 0.3 ± 4.7 mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively. However, the number of absolute BP differences within 5 mmHg was considerably fewer in those with preeclampsia when compared to the other two subgroups.

CONCLUSION: The BPro device can be recommended for BP measurement in pregnancy but should be used with caution in those with confirmed preeclampsia.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454