Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Adam Jakes, Julie Wade, Zoe Vowles, Paul T Seed, Andrew H Shennan, Lucy C Chappell, Diane Nzelu
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 380-384 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING |
DOIs | |
E-pub ahead of print | 14 Jun 2021 |
Additional links |
OBJECTIVE: To validate the BPro blood pressure (BP) wrist device for use in pregnancy and preeclampsia according to the Universal Standard protocol.
PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: BP was measured sequentially in 45 pregnant women (including 15 with preeclampsia, 15 with gestational hypertension and 15 who remained normotensive) alternating between a mercury sphygmomanometer and BPro device.
RESULTS: The BPro is accurate in pregnancy with a mean device-observer difference of -1.7 ± 6.1 and 0.1 ± 4.6 mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively. In women with preeclampsia, BPro also met the validation criteria for the Universal Standard protocol with a mean device-observer difference of -2.7 ± 7.1 and 0.3 ± 4.7 mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively. However, the number of absolute BP differences within 5 mmHg was considerably fewer in those with preeclampsia when compared to the other two subgroups.
CONCLUSION: The BPro device can be recommended for BP measurement in pregnancy but should be used with caution in those with confirmed preeclampsia.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454