King's College London

Research portal

Ventral Striatal Activation During Reward Processing in Psychosis: A Neurofunctional Meta-Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Joaquim Radua, Andre Schmidt, Stefan Borgwardt, Andreas Heinz, Florian Schlagenhauf, Philip McGuire, Paolo Fusar-Poli

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1243-1251
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA Psychiatry
Volume72
Issue number12
DOIs
Published1 Dec 2015

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Abnormal reward processing is suggested to underlie the formation of psychotic symptoms, likely driven by elevated ventral striatal (VS) dopamine levels. Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies reveal alterations of VS activity during reward processing in patients with chronic psychosis and first episode of psychosis, as well as individuals at high risk for psychosis, but findings are inconclusive, conflicting, and difficult to subject to meta-analysis without introducing bias because several studies reported that findings were not statistically significant but did not report statistics. OBJECTIVE To assess the differences between patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and healthy controls in VS activation during reward processing. DATA SOURCES Web of Knowledge database (incorporating Web of Science and MEDLINE) until July 2015, including references of eligible articles and reviews. STUDY SELECTION Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies comparing VS activity during monetary reward processing between patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders or clinical or genetic high-risk state for psychosis and healthy controls. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Statistics and thresholds related to the main outcome measures and potential moderators were independently retrieved by 2 investigators. Effect sizes were analyzed using Meta NSUE, a random-effects method that enables the unbiased inclusion of nonstatistically significant unreported effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Effect size of the group differences in VS activity, and correlation between VS activity and negative and positive symptom scores in patients. RESULTS Them eta-analysis included 23 studies (917 patients) for reward anticipation, 9 studies (358 patients) for reward feedback, and 8 studies (314 patients) for reward prediction error. We found significant bilateral VS hypoactivation during reward anticipation (23 studies, n = 917) in patients compared with healthy controls (left/right Cohen d, -0.50/-0.70; P< .001). Left VS abnormality was more severe in patients with high scores of negative symptoms during reward anticipation (r=-0.41; P< .001). Patients also showed hypoactivation during reward feedback (left/right d, -0.57/-0.56; P< .001). Simulations showed that exclusion of studies with nonstatistically significant unreported effects was associated with a strong bias (d bias=0.22), whereas estimations using Meta NSUE were unbiased even when statistics were seldom reported (d bias < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This meta-analysis provides evidence that patients with psychosis demonstrate VS hypoactivation during reward anticipation. The assessment of VS prediction errors seems to be promising, but more studies are needed to draw valid conclusions.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454