King's College London

Research portal

Vertical Agreements Under EU Competition Law: Proposals for Pushing Article 101 Analysis, and the Modernization Process, to a Logical Conclusion

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Alison Irene Jones, Miguel de la Mano

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Research Methods of Competition Law
EditorsD. Healey, M. Jacobs
PublisherEdward Elgar
Chapter8
Pages167-203
Number of pages37
ISBN (Electronic)9781785368653
ISBN (Print)9781785368646
DOIs
Accepted/In press2018
Published10 Nov 2020

King's Authors

Abstract

This chapter examines the analysis of vertical agreements under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). It observes that, in spite of modernization and the European Commission’s promise to adopt a more ‘effects-based’ approach towards vertical agreements based on a consumer welfare objective, Article 101 analysis has not evolved as might have been anticipated. Rather, the legal system still fails adequately to reflect, and is out of kilter with, the economic logic of vertical restraints. Not only does it continue to rely heavily on broad presumptions of illegality which, as applied, are not justified by economic theory or experience (creating Type I error risks), but the dearth of decided cases means that a transparent structure for analysing and balancing the competitive harms and benefits of vertical arrangements (especially new online distribution practices) has not developed. This uncertainty has been compounded by the disparities in approach to enforcement emerging at the national level. The chapter considers how best to align European Union (EU) law with mainstream economic thinking, and proposes an approach which focuses more closely on the concepts underpinning the rules than the historic categories of analysis that have, to date, been relied upon. It suggests how these changes might be effected and an administrable system governing vertical restraints put in place. It argues that, in order to achieve this change, the Commission should publish some carefully selected decisions in relation to vertical agreements, especially in more complex effects cases. Such decisions will provide the opportunity for scrutiny of the Commission’s policy by the EU courts and ensure that the law in this important area is elucidated, particularly as distribution practices adapt to the challenges presented by the online environment and growth of e-commerce. These decisions, along with the information gathered in the course of the Commission’s e-commerce sector inquiry, and its review of the 2010 regime, may provide the crucial foundations for the revision of the guidelines and block exemption governing vertical agreements in the EU.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454