TY - JOUR
T1 - Volatile Organic Compounds in Feces Associate With Response to Dietary Intervention in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
AU - Rossi, Megan
AU - Aggio, Raphael
AU - Staudacher, Heidi M.
AU - Lomer, Miranda C.
AU - Lindsay, James O.
AU - Irving, Peter
AU - Probert, Chris
AU - Whelan, Kevin
PY - 2017/10/7
Y1 - 2017/10/7
N2 - Background & Aims Dietary interventions are effective in management of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), although responses vary. We investigated whether fecal levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associate with response to dietary interventions in patients with IBS. Methods Adults who fulfilled the Rome III criteria for IBS were recruited to a 2x2 factorial randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to a group counselled to follow a diet low in fructans, galacto-oligosaccharides, lactose, fructose, and polyols (low-FODMAP diet, n=46) or a group that received placebo dietary advice (sham diet, n=47) for 4 weeks. Patients from each group were also given either a multi-strain probiotic or placebo supplement. Response was defined as a reduction of 50 points or more on the validated IBS symptom scoring system. Fecal samples were collected from participants at baseline and end of the 4-week study period; VOCs were analyzed by a gas-chromatography sensor device. VOC profiles were determined using a pipeline involving wavelet transformation followed by feature selection based on random forest. A partial least squares classifier was constructed to classify VOC profiles by response and were accuracies determined using 10-fold cross-validation. Results Data from 93 patients who completed the study (63 female) were used in the final analysis. More patients responded to the low-FODMAP diet (37/46, 80%) than the sham diet (21/47, 45%) (P<.001), but there was no difference in response between patients given the probiotic (31/49, 63%) vs the placebo (27/44, 61%) (P=0.850), with no interaction between the diet and supplement interventions. At baseline, VOC profiles contained 15 features that classified response to the low-FODMAP diet with an accuracy of 100% (95% CI, 96%–99%) and 10 features that classified response to probiotic with an accuracy of 89% (95% CI, 86%–92%). End of treatment models achieved similar predictive powers and accuracies. Conclusion Fecal VOC profiling is a low cost, non-invasive tool that might be used to predict responses of patients with IBS to LFD and probiotics and identify their mechanisms of action. ISRCTN registry no: 02275221
AB - Background & Aims Dietary interventions are effective in management of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), although responses vary. We investigated whether fecal levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associate with response to dietary interventions in patients with IBS. Methods Adults who fulfilled the Rome III criteria for IBS were recruited to a 2x2 factorial randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to a group counselled to follow a diet low in fructans, galacto-oligosaccharides, lactose, fructose, and polyols (low-FODMAP diet, n=46) or a group that received placebo dietary advice (sham diet, n=47) for 4 weeks. Patients from each group were also given either a multi-strain probiotic or placebo supplement. Response was defined as a reduction of 50 points or more on the validated IBS symptom scoring system. Fecal samples were collected from participants at baseline and end of the 4-week study period; VOCs were analyzed by a gas-chromatography sensor device. VOC profiles were determined using a pipeline involving wavelet transformation followed by feature selection based on random forest. A partial least squares classifier was constructed to classify VOC profiles by response and were accuracies determined using 10-fold cross-validation. Results Data from 93 patients who completed the study (63 female) were used in the final analysis. More patients responded to the low-FODMAP diet (37/46, 80%) than the sham diet (21/47, 45%) (P<.001), but there was no difference in response between patients given the probiotic (31/49, 63%) vs the placebo (27/44, 61%) (P=0.850), with no interaction between the diet and supplement interventions. At baseline, VOC profiles contained 15 features that classified response to the low-FODMAP diet with an accuracy of 100% (95% CI, 96%–99%) and 10 features that classified response to probiotic with an accuracy of 89% (95% CI, 86%–92%). End of treatment models achieved similar predictive powers and accuracies. Conclusion Fecal VOC profiling is a low cost, non-invasive tool that might be used to predict responses of patients with IBS to LFD and probiotics and identify their mechanisms of action. ISRCTN registry no: 02275221
KW - functional bowel disorder
KW - low FODMAP diet
KW - probiotics
KW - microbiome
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.09.055
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.09.055
M3 - Article
SN - 1542-3565
JO - CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
JF - CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
ER -