Wars over Wildlife: Green Militarisation and Just War Theory

Amy Dickman, Paul Johnson*, Peter Coals, Lauren Harrington, Peter Tyrrell, Keith Somerville, Alayne Cotterill, David Whetham

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Militarisation of conservation (sometimes known as 'green militarisation') is an issue of growing international interest. Rhino horn is immensely valuable (in 2013 its value exceeded that of gold or cocaine), and its illegal trade has attracted widespread attention. Conservationists have declared a 'war' on poaching, with extensive military resources deployed to combat it. This sometimes includes operations which are referred to, particularly in the media, as 'shoot-to-kill'. These can be tantamount to extra-judicial killings. We scrutinise this issue using 'Just War' principles, to explore whether the 'war' on poaching meets the criteria expected of armed conflict. Our perspective suggests that it fails both ethical and pragmatic examination. This piece encourages conservation scientists, and the public, to consider which actions are justified in protecting wildlife, and how we should rethink conservation policy to achieve ethical, successful outcomes for both people and wildlife.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-297
Number of pages5
JournalConservation and Society
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • anti-poaching
  • conservation
  • green militarisation
  • Just War
  • rhino

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wars over Wildlife: Green Militarisation and Just War Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this