What Postcolonial Theory Doesn't Say

Anna Bernard; Ziad Magdy Elmarsafy; Stuart Murray

What Postcolonial Theory Doesn't Say

Anna Bernard (Editor), Ziad Magdy Elmarsafy (Editor), Stuart Murray (Editor)

University of Leeds

Research output: Book/Report › Book › peer-review

Abstract

This book reclaims postcolonial theory, addressing persistent limitations in the geographical, disciplinary, and methodological assumptions of its dominant formations, and emerging from an investment in the future of postcolonial studies and a commitment to its basic premise; namely the conception of particular cultural and literary articulations in relation to larger structures of colonial and imperial domination as a way of putting the theory back in postcolonial theory. To a certain extent, postcolonial theory is a victim of its own success, in part from the institutionalization of the insights that it has enabled: now that they no longer seem new, it is hard to know what the field?s work should be beyond these general commitments, or what its practitioners should be debating. The renewal of popular anti-imperial energies across the globe provides a rare opportunity to reassert the political and theoretical value of the postcolonial as a comparative, interdisciplinary, and oppositional paradigm. This collection makes a claim for what postcolonial theory can say through the work of scholars articulating what it still cannot or will not say. It explores ideas that a more aesthetically sophisticated postcolonial theory might be able to address, focusing on questions of visibility, performance, and literariness. Contributors highlight some of the shortcomings of current postcolonial theory in relation to contemporary political developments such as Zimbabwean land reform, postcommunism, and the economic rise of East Asia. Finally, they address the disciplinary, geographical, and methodological exclusions from postcolonial studies through a detailed focus on new disciplinary directions (management studies, theories of the state), overlooked places and perspectives (Palestine, Weimar Germany, the environmentalism of the poor), and the necessity of materialist analysis for understanding both world and world literary systems.

Original language	English
Publisher	Routledge
ISBN (Print)	978-0415857970, 041585797X
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2015

Publication series

Name	Routledge Research in Postcolonial Literatures
Publisher	Routledge

Keywords

Literary theory and criticism
Postcolonial Studies
Literature and Literary Theory
Political Science and International Relations
Geography, Planning and Development
Cuba
Zimbabwe
Israel/Palestine
Germany
Ecocriticism

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Cite this

@book{f57d473e3f4845b3ac1a67dd2f3d3232,

title = "What Postcolonial Theory Doesn't Say",

abstract = "This book reclaims postcolonial theory, addressing persistent limitations in the geographical, disciplinary, and methodological assumptions of its dominant formations, and emerging from an investment in the future of postcolonial studies and a commitment to its basic premise; namely the conception of particular cultural and literary articulations in relation to larger structures of colonial and imperial domination as a way of putting the theory back in postcolonial theory. To a certain extent, postcolonial theory is a victim of its own success, in part from the institutionalization of the insights that it has enabled: now that they no longer seem new, it is hard to know what the field?s work should be beyond these general commitments, or what its practitioners should be debating. The renewal of popular anti-imperial energies across the globe provides a rare opportunity to reassert the political and theoretical value of the postcolonial as a comparative, interdisciplinary, and oppositional paradigm. This collection makes a claim for what postcolonial theory can say through the work of scholars articulating what it still cannot or will not say. It explores ideas that a more aesthetically sophisticated postcolonial theory might be able to address, focusing on questions of visibility, performance, and literariness. Contributors highlight some of the shortcomings of current postcolonial theory in relation to contemporary political developments such as Zimbabwean land reform, postcommunism, and the economic rise of East Asia. Finally, they address the disciplinary, geographical, and methodological exclusions from postcolonial studies through a detailed focus on new disciplinary directions (management studies, theories of the state), overlooked places and perspectives (Palestine, Weimar Germany, the environmentalism of the poor), and the necessity of materialist analysis for understanding both world and world literary systems.",

keywords = "Literary theory and criticism, Postcolonial Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations, Geography, Planning and Development, Cuba, Zimbabwe, Israel/Palestine, Germany, Ecocriticism",

editor = "Anna Bernard and Elmarsafy, {Ziad Magdy} and Stuart Murray",

note = "M1 - Book",

year = "2015",

month = sep,

day = "1",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-0415857970",

series = "Routledge Research in Postcolonial Literatures",

publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - What Postcolonial Theory Doesn't Say

A2 - Bernard, Anna

A2 - Elmarsafy, Ziad Magdy

A2 - Murray, Stuart

N1 - M1 - Book

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - This book reclaims postcolonial theory, addressing persistent limitations in the geographical, disciplinary, and methodological assumptions of its dominant formations, and emerging from an investment in the future of postcolonial studies and a commitment to its basic premise; namely the conception of particular cultural and literary articulations in relation to larger structures of colonial and imperial domination as a way of putting the theory back in postcolonial theory. To a certain extent, postcolonial theory is a victim of its own success, in part from the institutionalization of the insights that it has enabled: now that they no longer seem new, it is hard to know what the field?s work should be beyond these general commitments, or what its practitioners should be debating. The renewal of popular anti-imperial energies across the globe provides a rare opportunity to reassert the political and theoretical value of the postcolonial as a comparative, interdisciplinary, and oppositional paradigm. This collection makes a claim for what postcolonial theory can say through the work of scholars articulating what it still cannot or will not say. It explores ideas that a more aesthetically sophisticated postcolonial theory might be able to address, focusing on questions of visibility, performance, and literariness. Contributors highlight some of the shortcomings of current postcolonial theory in relation to contemporary political developments such as Zimbabwean land reform, postcommunism, and the economic rise of East Asia. Finally, they address the disciplinary, geographical, and methodological exclusions from postcolonial studies through a detailed focus on new disciplinary directions (management studies, theories of the state), overlooked places and perspectives (Palestine, Weimar Germany, the environmentalism of the poor), and the necessity of materialist analysis for understanding both world and world literary systems.

AB - This book reclaims postcolonial theory, addressing persistent limitations in the geographical, disciplinary, and methodological assumptions of its dominant formations, and emerging from an investment in the future of postcolonial studies and a commitment to its basic premise; namely the conception of particular cultural and literary articulations in relation to larger structures of colonial and imperial domination as a way of putting the theory back in postcolonial theory. To a certain extent, postcolonial theory is a victim of its own success, in part from the institutionalization of the insights that it has enabled: now that they no longer seem new, it is hard to know what the field?s work should be beyond these general commitments, or what its practitioners should be debating. The renewal of popular anti-imperial energies across the globe provides a rare opportunity to reassert the political and theoretical value of the postcolonial as a comparative, interdisciplinary, and oppositional paradigm. This collection makes a claim for what postcolonial theory can say through the work of scholars articulating what it still cannot or will not say. It explores ideas that a more aesthetically sophisticated postcolonial theory might be able to address, focusing on questions of visibility, performance, and literariness. Contributors highlight some of the shortcomings of current postcolonial theory in relation to contemporary political developments such as Zimbabwean land reform, postcommunism, and the economic rise of East Asia. Finally, they address the disciplinary, geographical, and methodological exclusions from postcolonial studies through a detailed focus on new disciplinary directions (management studies, theories of the state), overlooked places and perspectives (Palestine, Weimar Germany, the environmentalism of the poor), and the necessity of materialist analysis for understanding both world and world literary systems.

KW - Literary theory and criticism

KW - Postcolonial Studies

KW - Literature and Literary Theory

KW - Political Science and International Relations

KW - Geography, Planning and Development

KW - Cuba

KW - Zimbabwe

KW - Israel/Palestine

KW - Germany

KW - Ecocriticism

M3 - Book

SN - 978-0415857970

SN - 041585797X

T3 - Routledge Research in Postcolonial Literatures

BT - What Postcolonial Theory Doesn't Say

PB - Routledge

ER -

What Postcolonial Theory Doesn't Say

Abstract

Publication series

Keywords

UN SDGs

Fingerprint

Cite this