What’s wrong with inequality? Some Rousseauian perspectives

Robin Douglass

doi:10.1177/1474885114566132

What’s wrong with inequality? Some Rousseauian perspectives

Robin Douglass

Political Economy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

594 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, I review Frederick Neuhouser’s latest book, Rousseau’s Critique of Inequality, while critically assessing the legacy of Rousseau’s ideas on inequality and amour-propre for contemporary political philosophy. I challenge the widely held notion that the account of equality set out in the Social Contract should be read as a (partial) remedy to the problems generated by amour-propre, and suggest that we have to turn to Rousseau’s other writings to reconstruct his own political remedies for these problems. I then draw attention to a much neglected dimension of Rousseau’s critique of inequality, which concerns the effect inequality has on our ability to identify with other humans and feel compassion for them. Taken together, these considerations highlight some of the limitations of the dominant Kantian–Rawlsian strand of Rousseau interpretation within contemporary liberal political philosophy.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	368–377
Number of pages	10
Journal	EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL THEORY
Volume	14
Issue number	3
Early online date	12 Jan 2015
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885114566132
Publication status	Published - 1 Jul 2015

Keywords

Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Frederick Neuhouser
Inequality
amour-propre
Immanuel Kant
John Rawls

Access to Document

10.1177/1474885114566132

What's Wrong with Inequality, pre-proof version
Copyright © 2015 by SAGE Publications
Accepted author manuscript, 42.6 KB

Cite this

@article{8b6f9a8f178f461e8abd41421592f846,

title = "What{\textquoteright}s wrong with inequality? Some Rousseauian perspectives",

abstract = "In this article, I review Frederick Neuhouser{\textquoteright}s latest book, Rousseau{\textquoteright}s Critique of Inequality, while critically assessing the legacy of Rousseau{\textquoteright}s ideas on inequality and amour-propre for contemporary political philosophy. I challenge the widely held notion that the account of equality set out in the Social Contract should be read as a (partial) remedy to the problems generated by amour-propre, and suggest that we have to turn to Rousseau{\textquoteright}s other writings to reconstruct his own political remedies for these problems. I then draw attention to a much neglected dimension of Rousseau{\textquoteright}s critique of inequality, which concerns the effect inequality has on our ability to identify with other humans and feel compassion for them. Taken together, these considerations highlight some of the limitations of the dominant Kantian–Rawlsian strand of Rousseau interpretation within contemporary liberal political philosophy.",

keywords = "Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Frederick Neuhouser, Inequality, amour-propre, Immanuel Kant, John Rawls",

author = "Robin Douglass",

year = "2015",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1474885114566132",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "368–377 ",

journal = "EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL THEORY",

issn = "1474-8851",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What’s wrong with inequality? Some Rousseauian perspectives

AU - Douglass, Robin

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - In this article, I review Frederick Neuhouser’s latest book, Rousseau’s Critique of Inequality, while critically assessing the legacy of Rousseau’s ideas on inequality and amour-propre for contemporary political philosophy. I challenge the widely held notion that the account of equality set out in the Social Contract should be read as a (partial) remedy to the problems generated by amour-propre, and suggest that we have to turn to Rousseau’s other writings to reconstruct his own political remedies for these problems. I then draw attention to a much neglected dimension of Rousseau’s critique of inequality, which concerns the effect inequality has on our ability to identify with other humans and feel compassion for them. Taken together, these considerations highlight some of the limitations of the dominant Kantian–Rawlsian strand of Rousseau interpretation within contemporary liberal political philosophy.

AB - In this article, I review Frederick Neuhouser’s latest book, Rousseau’s Critique of Inequality, while critically assessing the legacy of Rousseau’s ideas on inequality and amour-propre for contemporary political philosophy. I challenge the widely held notion that the account of equality set out in the Social Contract should be read as a (partial) remedy to the problems generated by amour-propre, and suggest that we have to turn to Rousseau’s other writings to reconstruct his own political remedies for these problems. I then draw attention to a much neglected dimension of Rousseau’s critique of inequality, which concerns the effect inequality has on our ability to identify with other humans and feel compassion for them. Taken together, these considerations highlight some of the limitations of the dominant Kantian–Rawlsian strand of Rousseau interpretation within contemporary liberal political philosophy.

KW - Jean-Jacques Rousseau

KW - Frederick Neuhouser

KW - Inequality

KW - amour-propre

KW - Immanuel Kant

KW - John Rawls

U2 - 10.1177/1474885114566132

DO - 10.1177/1474885114566132

M3 - Review article

SN - 1474-8851

VL - 14

SP - 368

EP - 377

JO - EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL THEORY

JF - EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL THEORY

IS - 3

ER -

What’s wrong with inequality? Some Rousseauian perspectives

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this