When many Davids collaborate with one Goliath: How inter-organizational networks (fail to) manage size differentials

Johann Fortwengel, Jörg Sydow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
284 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How do organizations of vastly different size collaborate in order to achieve a common goal? While this poses less of a problem when the network is orchestrated by a classic lead firm, in networks exhibiting a shared governance mode, where leadership responsibilities are more or less equally distributed, size differentials present a critical management challenge. In this paper, we contribute to the literature on coordination in and of inter-organizational arrangements by emphasizing the so far largely neglected role of size for managing close collaborative relationships. We study the case of Apprenticeship Network, a network that originally consisted of seven small and medium-sized enterprises, but which then accepted a very large multinational firm as a new member. By unpacking how the network coordinated its endeavour over time to achieve accountability, predictability and a common understanding as critical conditions for effective coordination, we explore how coordination effectiveness may deteriorate and result in the failure of the collaborative effort. We pay special attention to the role of size in these processes, and we theorize how the strategic front and back-staging of agreed-upon rules and norms facilitates the formation, maintenance and deletion of a tie, thus producing important network dynamics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-420
Number of pages18
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Volume31
Issue number2
Early online date27 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Apr 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When many Davids collaborate with one Goliath: How inter-organizational networks (fail to) manage size differentials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this