Why does parental language input style predict child language development? A twin study of gene–environment correlation

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why does parental language input style predict child language development?

T2 - A twin study of gene–environment correlation

AU - Dale, Philip S.

AU - Tosto, Maria Grazia

AU - Hayiou Thomas, Marianna

AU - Plomin, Robert

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - There are well-established correlations between parental input style and child language development, which have typically been interpreted as evidence that the input style causes, or influences the rate of, changes in child language. We present evidence from a large twin study (TEDS; 8395 pairs for this report) that there are also likely to be both child-to-parent effects and shared genetic effects on parent and child. Self-reported parental language style at child age 3 and age 4 was aggregated into an ‘informal language stimulation’ factor and a ‘corrective feedback’ factor at each age; the former was positively correlated with child language concurrently and longitudinally at 3, 4, and 4.5 years, whereas the latter was weakly and negatively correlated. Both parental input factors were moderately heritable, as was child language. Longitudinal bivariate analysis showed that the correlation between the language stimulation factor and child language was significantly and moderately due to shared genes. There is some suggestive evidence from longitudinal phenotypic analysis that the prediction from parental language stimulation to child language includes both evocative and passive gene–environment correlation, with the latter playing a larger role.

AB - There are well-established correlations between parental input style and child language development, which have typically been interpreted as evidence that the input style causes, or influences the rate of, changes in child language. We present evidence from a large twin study (TEDS; 8395 pairs for this report) that there are also likely to be both child-to-parent effects and shared genetic effects on parent and child. Self-reported parental language style at child age 3 and age 4 was aggregated into an ‘informal language stimulation’ factor and a ‘corrective feedback’ factor at each age; the former was positively correlated with child language concurrently and longitudinally at 3, 4, and 4.5 years, whereas the latter was weakly and negatively correlated. Both parental input factors were moderately heritable, as was child language. Longitudinal bivariate analysis showed that the correlation between the language stimulation factor and child language was significantly and moderately due to shared genes. There is some suggestive evidence from longitudinal phenotypic analysis that the prediction from parental language stimulation to child language includes both evocative and passive gene–environment correlation, with the latter playing a larger role.

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4610950

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.07.004

M3 - Article

SN - 0021-9924

VL - 57

SP - 106

EP - 117

JO - Journal of Communication Disorders

JF - Journal of Communication Disorders

ER -