Why, when and how do secondary-care clinicians have emergency care and treatment planning conversations? Qualitative findings from the ReSPECT Evaluation study

Karin Eli; Claire A. Hawkes; Cynthia Ochieng; Caroline J. Huxley; Catherine Baldock; Peter-Marc Fortune; Jonathan Fuld; Gavin D. Perkins; Anne-Marie Slowther; Frances Griffiths

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.013

King's College London

King's main site

Research portal

Home
Researchers
Research Groups
Research Outputs
Research Funding
Internal

Research Outputs
Theses
.
Journals
Publishers

Why, when and how do secondary-care clinicians have emergency care and treatment planning conversations? Qualitative findings from the ReSPECT Evaluation study

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Karin Eli, Claire A. Hawkes, Cynthia Ochieng, Caroline J. Huxley, Catherine Baldock, Peter-Marc Fortune, Jonathan Fuld, Gavin D. Perkins, Anne-Marie Slowther, Frances Griffiths

Overview
Citation formats

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	343-350
Journal	Resuscitation
Volume	162
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.013
Published	May 2021

King's Authors

Claire A. Hawkes (Applied Technologies for Clinical Care)

Post to Twitter
Post to FaceBook
Post to Digg

View graph of relations

King's College London - Homepage

Why, when and how do secondary-care clinicians have emergency care and treatment planning conversations? Qualitative findings from the ReSPECT Evaluation study

King's Authors

By the same authors

With some of the same researchers

From the same journal