Abstract
Objective: To explore women’s experiences of maternity service reconfiguration during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Design: Qualitative interview study.
Setting: South London, United Kingdom.
Participants: Women (N=23) who gave birth between March and August 2020 in one of the ten South London maternity hospitals.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted (N=23), via video-conferencing software. Transcribed interviews were analysed ‘by hand’ using Microsoft Word. Template analysis was selected to code, analyse, and interpret data, according to the findings of a recently-published national survey of maternity service reconfiguration across the UK in response to COVID-19.
Findings: Three main themes emerged through analysis: (i) Disruption to In-Person Care and Increased Virtual Care Provision, (ii) Changes to Labour and Birth Preferences and Plans, (iii) Advice for Navigating Maternity Services During a Pandemic.
Key Conclusions: Women reported mixed views on the reduction in scheduled in-person appointments. The increase in remote care, especially via telephone, was not well endorsed by women. Furthermore, women reported an under-reliance on healthcare professionals for support, rather turning to family.
Implications for Practice: We provide insight into the experiences of women who received antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings should inform healthcare policy to build back better maternity care services after the pandemic.
Design: Qualitative interview study.
Setting: South London, United Kingdom.
Participants: Women (N=23) who gave birth between March and August 2020 in one of the ten South London maternity hospitals.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted (N=23), via video-conferencing software. Transcribed interviews were analysed ‘by hand’ using Microsoft Word. Template analysis was selected to code, analyse, and interpret data, according to the findings of a recently-published national survey of maternity service reconfiguration across the UK in response to COVID-19.
Findings: Three main themes emerged through analysis: (i) Disruption to In-Person Care and Increased Virtual Care Provision, (ii) Changes to Labour and Birth Preferences and Plans, (iii) Advice for Navigating Maternity Services During a Pandemic.
Key Conclusions: Women reported mixed views on the reduction in scheduled in-person appointments. The increase in remote care, especially via telephone, was not well endorsed by women. Furthermore, women reported an under-reliance on healthcare professionals for support, rather turning to family.
Implications for Practice: We provide insight into the experiences of women who received antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings should inform healthcare policy to build back better maternity care services after the pandemic.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 103116 |
Journal | MIDWIFERY |
Volume | 102 |
Issue number | 103116 |
Early online date | 5 Aug 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2021 |
Keywords
- Maternity Care
- COVID-19
- Service Delivery
- Women's Experiences
- Qualitative Research