King's College London

Research portal

Wrong by convention

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)553-575
Number of pages23
JournalETHICS
Volume127
Issue number3
Early online date1 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

Some acts (mala in se) are wrong prior to any social prohibition (e.g., murder). Other acts (mala prohibita) are wrong only once socially prohibited (e.g., traffic violations). This article considers certain obligations of care that parents owe to their children and children to their parents. Violations of these familial obligations are like paradigm mala prohibita in that they are wrongs created by social convention. But, it is argued, they are unlike paradigm mala prohibita in that their prohibition is not justified merely by the desirable consequences of prohibiting them but also by the value of the prohibition itself.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454